Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Imperial Life in the Emerald City by Rajiv Chandrasekara

Where do I begin? How do I start to review a book such as this? Is this one of my favorite book? Oh, no. Not even close. But this is a very IMPORTANT book. This might be one of those books that everyone should read.
First of all, after 9/11, if America needed to chase after the perpetrators of that event, we should have gone after Saudi Arabia rather than Iraq. Where there any Iraqis among them? Out of nineteen, fifteen were from Saudi Arabia. Two were from UAE. One was from Egypt. One was from Lebannon. I don’t want to go into why America declared war on a sovereign nation which had nothing to do with 9/11, BUT I’d like to believe that President Bush did what he believed was best for our country at the time.
I think this book should be required reading for the President of United States and his cabinet members as well the various department heads and all those who are going into foreign service. I’m sure America will inadvertently be drawn into another nation building sometime in the near future. There is so much to learn from this book. Unfortunately, it’s mostly what not to do, not the other way around.
I’m also currently reading John Adams (which is a much thicker book), which I’m enjoying immensely. What surprises me about that book is…how in the world did all the stars and planets line up, and all these men, with flaws and all, came together to form this great nation? It’s as if all the men rose to the challenge of the time and pulled together and compensated for one another’s weaknesses. America was indeed lucky to have such men at such desperate times. But supposedly Oprah Winfry famously declared that she didn’t believe in luck. That luck only happened when preparation (however long it took) met opportunity.
Well, America’s efforts to rebuild Iraq were EXACTLY the opposite. How President Bush and his cabinet can pull together a team that failed and disappointed at almost every turn was amazing. How they squandered such an opportunity to rebuild Iraq is stupefying (I know. I’m repeating myself). I don’t think they could have put together a worse team if they’d tried. I guess that’s the sad part – they pulled the team together based on loyalty and party allegiance rather than experience and capabilities. A couple of people have succeeded, against overwhelming odds and by breaking the rules, but most have failed because they were driven by American ignorance and arrogance.
SPOILER ALERT.
“As the [American] viceroy, [Paul] Bremer need only put down his signature to impose a new law, or to abolish an old one. He wasn’t required to consult with Iraqis or even seek their consent.” How does this work? An American, who is not an expert in Arabic anything, gets this kind of power? If in the far future, America’s power wanes and some other country occupies it for whatever reason, would we want someone to impose or abolish our laws with a stroke of his/her pen?
I’ve been reading some books on Korean history in the time of Japanese occupation. In these books, celebrated Korean patriots (and yes, some were suicide bombers) who fought against the occupation were called terrorists, rebels, commies, etc. by the Japanese occupiers. The books go on to explain that any man, in any country, would most likely to resist and fight against an occupying power, no matter what. There is no benevolent occupying force.  There are no greater incentives to bear arms and fight than for your family, for your home, for your culture, and for your country. This should not be a new concept to the American diplomatic corp, should it?
Whether it is McPherson’s clean-slate approach to forgiving debt and nullifying assets to Foley’s utter disregard for the international law which prohibits the sale of assets by an occupation government when he talked about privatization, these people didn’t consider what the lasting consequences of their actions would be. Considering that Alexander Hamilton, America’s first treasury secretary, insisted on the American government making good on its foreign and domestic debts, McPherson’s approach was flawed but worse still, he refused to listen to any other input.
One after another, the list of ineptitude, misdirections, lost opportunities, not taking input from native Iraqis or regional experts, unscrupulous contractors, and ignorant arrogance is appalling and eye-opening. But worst of all (in my point of view), is that Americans forced the Iraqis to identify themselves in sectarian terms. In their blind, formulaic efforts to create a more “democratic government,” the Americans forced each Iraqi to declare himself as a Shiite, a Kurd, a Sunni, a Christian, a Turkmen, etc. The Iraqi governing council had strict quotas – 13 Shiite Arabs, 5 Sunni Arabs, 5 Sunni Kurds, 1 Christian, and 1 Turkmen. Before this, most Iraqis “…never saw each other as Sunnis or Shiites first. We were Iraqis first.” This forced identification led to dramatic rise in sectarian violence which continues to this day.
I, who hate to dog-ear any book, have dog-eared many pages in this book, because I wanted to write about those issues. But I’m getting tired and depressed (because there are so many…), so I’ll let you find out for yourself.
The last bit…in an interview before his departure from Iraq, Paul Bremer, the American viceroy, touted “lowering of Iraq’s tax rate, the liberalization of foreign-investment laws, and the reduction of import duties” as among his biggest accomplishments in Iraq. To that, I just want to say – what the…?
I usually read fiction because partly, I want to live in denial and think that these horrible things (not just talking about this book) don’t happen in real life. But this is one book that everyone should read because it’s so incredible and stunning.
This is an eloquent and a riveting book that is surprisingly balanced in its writing.  It’s a chronicle of what took place. A set of data put into words. But I can’t deny that the data, how little was accomplished for so much money, is damning. But most importantly, although these CPA staffers thought they were doing good, how much misery was heaped on the Iraqi people by the sum of CPA’s good intentions based on their sheer ignorance and arrogance is almost unforgivable.
Having said this, why don't you read it for yourself, and you be the judge?

Monday, May 27, 2013

On Wings of Eagles by Ken Follett

There are less than a handful of people I want to meet and talk to, just for an hour or so, because I am intrigued them, their work, or their writing – Michio Kaku, Jodi Piccoult, and Elon Musk. Now, I have another on this list, Ross Perot. I’d place him even before Michio Kaku, and that’s saying a lot.
This book is not fiction. It’s non-fiction. That fact blew me away.
This book chronicles the events of Iran hostage crisis as EDS employees, Ross Perot’s company, experience them in Iran. There are so many astounding FACTS associated with this event, but one that I find so inspiring and admirable is about Ross Perot himself. I was astounded by his dedication to his employees. His willingness to take gargantuan risks – to his reputation, to his fortune, and to his person, was jaw-dropping. He attacked his mounting problems with persistence, and his attitude of not taking no for an answer and continuing to search for a solution was remarkable. His moral fortitude was amazing, and I deeply regret not having considered him seriously when he ran for presidency.
These EDS employees and the rescuers who went into Iran did get lucky, but Oprah famously declared that she didn’t believe in luck. Luck only happens when one is ready, with all pistons firing, as the opportunities come along. Time and time again, this group of courageous and crafty men was ready to take an advantage of any and every opportunity that came along.
This book reads like a fiction. The only books of Ken Follett I have read are The Pillars of the Earth and World without End, so I can’t really compare On Wings of Eagles to any of his thrillers, but I bet it’ll rank high up there with the best of his thrillers.
I’d recommend this book to anyone who is interested in history and a good read. It’s just startling that this is non-fiction (I know. I’ve said it before).
I’m a wavering democrat, but if I ever saw another Perot on ballot anywhere, I’d take a closer look. I don’t care if he or she is republican, independent, or some other party. To be raised by a father or grandfather like Ross and his moral fortitude, he or she definitely warrants a closer look.

Physics of the Impossible by Michio Kaku

I love this book because it helps me believe in one of my biggest passions – space travel. After I had taken a class in Astronomy in junior high school, I wanted to be an astronaut. Alas, it wasn’t meant to be because I suffer from motion sickness.

In the previous book review (On the Wings of Eagles), I’ve mentioned that Michio Kaku is one of those people I want to meet and talk to, just for a while, because I find them fascinating. Well, the reason I want to meet him is because he has the uncanny ability to transform incredibly esoteric and hard to understand information to something quite accessible and easy to digest. Such is the case with this book.

I am curious by nature. I want to know about everything, albeit salt or germs or black holes or dark matter. And this book answers my questions in spades. Whether it’s about force fields or invisibility or perpetual-motion machine or precognition, this book answers all. The best thing about it is that the answers are anchored in science, and he gives his best guess time frame for them to become a reality.

As for accessibility and easy to digest part, my ten-year-old son, who is an advanced, precocious reader, and has been very interested in science, read this book. Yes. He did have trouble understanding parts of it, and I tried to explain things to him more in detail (most of it, I had failed). However, the important point is that he did finish the book, and said he thought it was interesting. This is a feat for any writer, let alone a science book writer.

This book helps me believe the possibility in things that are deemed impossible. He does frame some of them in very, very long time (might as well be impossible), but he gives us a realistic time frame. That’s the point I appreciate.

I would highly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in a long list of topics that seem to skirt the science fiction side of science (phasers and death stars, teleportation, telepathy, psychokinesis, robots, ETs and UFOs, starships, anti-matter and anti-universe, faster than light, time travel, and parallel universe, etc.). I’m not sure I’d recommend it to another ten-year-old, but you’d know if that child is ready for this or not, so I’ll leave that to you.

Enjoy and may the force be with you!

Friday, January 25, 2013

Winter Garden by Kristin Hannah

Wow! What a book!
I like books that teach me something – history, human psyche, etc. Anything that’s a little out of ordinary. From this book, I learned about the siege of Leningrad during WWII, and it’s an amazingly horrifying tale. The resilience of human spirit is astounding, but the toll, what it takes to survive a historical event where somewhere between 700,000 and 1,000,000 people died of starvation while fighting off the German invasion of Russia, is also devastating.
I really didn’t think I would like this book so much. I read it with little expectation. I am embarrassed to say I’ve never heard of Kristin Hannah. I’m sure I passed by her books in the book stores, but it never drew me in (at least the covers). My sister-in-law was passing the books she’s already read around, and I decided to take a few (you can’t beat free books). I came home and read another book by her first. Although it was enjoyable, it didn’t move me as much as this book.
In the same vein as The Road, this book forced to me think about the unimaginable choices parents/mothers must make in face of abject devastation of their world. How do you choose who to save and who to let die among your beloved family members? Or your two children? Would you do anything to save them? What if you try your best to save both and end up losing them all? Would you be able to forgive yourself ?
Interwoven in the stories of three women (a mother and two daughters) who are all broken, some more broken than the others, is a beautiful fairytale based on the most horrific miseries their mother experienced during the siege of Leningrad. As the fairytale unfolds, the women find the unfettered truth that liberates them and helps them live their lives to the fullest.
Some reviews called this book a tearjerker, and it’s definitely that. But it’s so much more. It’s about a profound journey of the human spirit, and how it can claw its way out of hell through confronting the unrelenting memories of the most unforgivable choices (from the character’s perspective).